While iPadOS 18 introduces AI enhancements, some users continue to hope for a macOS-style workflow for better multitasking.
Apple’s latest operating system for its iPad lineup, iPadOS 18, was officially unveiled earlier this year with a host of transformative features, many of which lean heavily on artificial intelligence. While these updates further blur the line between traditional computing and mobile workflows, they also reignite an enduring debate: can the iPad ever fully replace a Mac for productivity and professional tasks? Despite Apple’s best efforts to push the iPad as a computer replacement, a subset of users continues to yearn for a macOS-style experience on the tablet, believing that this could unlock its full potential.
A Closer Look at the AI Enhancements in iPadOS 18
With iPadOS 18, Apple has introduced an array of AI-driven features designed to make the iPad smarter and more intuitive than ever before. At the heart of these updates is a significantly upgraded version of the CoreML framework, which powers the device's machine-learning capabilities. This enables new on-device intelligence features, ranging from predictive app suggestions to advanced content generation.
Perhaps the most talked-about addition is Smart Assistant AI, which integrates seamlessly into workflows across apps like Notes, Mail, and Safari. For instance, the AI can now generate draft emails based on short user prompts or even summarize lengthy documents with remarkable accuracy. In creative apps like Procreate or Final Cut Pro for iPad, the AI offers advanced suggestions, such as generating storyboard ideas or applying context-sensitive edits to video timelines.
The AI-driven multitasking system is another standout. Stage Manager, introduced in iPadOS 16, has been refined with machine learning to predict which apps users are likely to need next and pre-load them into memory. The result is smoother transitions and a more fluid experience for multitasking-heavy users. These advancements, while undeniably impressive, seem to underscore the fundamental divide between what iPadOS offers and what macOS users expect in a productivity device.
The Longstanding Push for a macOS-Like Experience
While iPadOS continues to evolve, many users have been vocal about their desire for a more macOS-like experience on the iPad. This isn’t a call for macOS to be directly transplanted onto the tablet but rather for some of its key elements—like a true desktop-class file system, expanded peripheral support, and robust app parity—to make their way to iPadOS.
One of the most persistent complaints among power users is the file management system. Despite the improvements brought by the Files app over the years, it still lacks the depth and flexibility of macOS Finder. Features like Finder’s tagging system, folder automation via Shortcuts, and a more open approach to external drive management remain high on the wishlist for many professionals.
Another point of contention is app functionality. Even though Apple has made strides in bringing professional-grade apps like Logic Pro and Final Cut Pro to iPad, many users argue that these apps are still slightly watered-down versions of their macOS counterparts. For example, certain features—such as plugin support in Logic or batch processing tools in Final Cut—are either missing or limited. These omissions make the iPad feel like a supplementary tool rather than a full replacement for a Mac in professional workflows.
Where AI Falls Short in Addressing Workflow Concerns
The AI-powered improvements in iPadOS 18 are undeniably forward-looking, but they also highlight the limitations of the system’s current structure. AI can enhance what’s already possible within the confines of iPadOS, but it doesn’t address the underlying barriers that make the platform feel restrictive for professional users.
For example, while the AI can predict which files or apps you might need next, it still operates within the constraints of iPadOS’s sandboxed app ecosystem. This means you can’t freely drag and drop files between apps in the way you can on macOS. Similarly, while AI can automate certain repetitive tasks, it doesn’t yet offer the same level of control that macOS’s Automator or Terminal commands provide for creating highly customized workflows.
The reliance on AI also raises questions about user agency. While predictive features can be helpful, some users feel that they remove a level of control from the process. This is particularly true in professional settings where precision and predictability are paramount. The "it just works" philosophy of iPadOS might appeal to casual users, but it often frustrates those who need fine-grained control over their devices.
Balancing Innovation with User Demands
Apple’s approach to the iPad has always been about defining its own path rather than mimicking traditional computers. The iPad’s touch-first interface, sleek design, and app ecosystem are what make it unique. However, as the iPad grows more powerful—with devices like the iPad Pro now featuring desktop-class M-series chips—the expectation for a desktop-class operating system grows louder.
Some argue that introducing macOS to the iPad would dilute what makes the tablet special, while others counter that the hardware’s capabilities are being underutilized by the constraints of iPadOS. Apple seems to be walking a tightrope, striving to satisfy both camps with features like Stage Manager and expanded keyboard and mouse support while stopping short of transforming the iPad into a Mac alternative outright.
The company’s reluctance to bridge the gap completely could be strategic. After all, Apple doesn’t want to cannibalize its own MacBook line by making the iPad too similar. At the same time, the rapid pace of innovation in the tech industry means that competitors like Microsoft’s Surface line are already offering hybrid solutions that cater to users looking for the best of both worlds.
Looking Ahead: Will the Divide Ever Be Closed?
As Apple continues to refine iPadOS, the question remains: will the iPad ever achieve the macOS-style workflow that some users crave? The answer may lie in finding a middle ground. Future versions of iPadOS could incorporate more advanced file management tools, better peripheral support, and enhanced multitasking capabilities without sacrificing the tablet’s core identity.
In the meantime, iPadOS 18 represents an important step forward. Its AI-driven features make the iPad smarter, more capable, and more adaptable than ever before. For users who embrace the iPad’s unique strengths, it’s a compelling update that further cements its place as a versatile tool for work and play. For those still holding out for a macOS-like experience, however, the wait continues, with no clear resolution in sight.
As it stands, the iPad is a device caught between two worlds: the simplicity and intuitiveness of a tablet and the power and flexibility of a traditional computer. Whether it leans further into one direction or finds a way to balance both remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the debate over its identity is far from over. Apple’s decisions in the coming years will not only shape the future of the iPad but could also redefine what users expect from personal computing devices as a whole.
Also Check:
Apple Mac Mini M4 Launches with M4 and M4 Pro Chips: Specs and Pricing Revealed
FiiO Drops $1K+ Sonic Nuke with Monster FA19 In-Ear Monitors